Book a call
Start your project

Implementation

GoHighLevel Security Review: Users, Permissions, Secrets, and Data Access

A GoHighLevel security review should verify account and asset ownership, current users, least-privilege roles, administrator count, multifactor authentication, connected applications, API credentials, domains, phone and email assets, export access, offboarding, data retention, and incident response. Remove stale access only after confirming operational dependencies and ownership.

By GHL Automation Architect, Best GoHighLevel Agency · Published · Reviewed · 2 min read

The short answer

A GoHighLevel security review should verify account and asset ownership, current users, least-privilege roles, administrator count, multifactor authentication, connected applications, API credentials, domains, phone and email assets, export access, offboarding, data retention, and incident response. Remove stale access only after confirming operational dependencies and ownership.

The governing principle

Access follows responsibility and ends with it. Shared logins, permanent agency ownership, and undocumented credentials weaken both security and business continuity.

Recommended architecture

Keep the client as owner of business-critical assets, use named users, separate administrative and daily roles, store secrets outside documents and code, inventory integrations, and log access reviews and offboarding.

Prerequisites

Do not configure the production change until these inputs are known and recorded.

  • Identify legal and operational owners for account, domain, phone, email, payments, and data.
  • Export user, role, integration, and credential inventories.
  • Map sensitive data types and required access.
  • Define incident contacts, evidence retention, and recovery authority.

Implementation procedure

Build in the smallest independently testable increments. Record the reason for each decision, not only the final setting.

  • Remove or constrain stale users after dependency review.
  • Reduce broad administrative access and enable available strong authentication.
  • Rotate exposed, shared, ownerless, or long-lived credentials.
  • Review connected apps, exports, webhooks, forms, and public assets.
  • Test offboarding and incident procedures.

Acceptance tests

A published asset is not necessarily a working system. Test normal, exception, duplicate, delayed, and recovery paths with traceable records.

  • Former staff and vendors cannot authenticate.
  • Daily users cannot perform unnecessary administrative actions.
  • Revoked integrations stop cleanly and alert an owner.
  • Critical assets can be recovered without one individual.
  • Sensitive exports and logs follow documented controls.

Rollback and recovery

Do not remove the only known recovery path. Establish verified client ownership and a second authorized administrator before changing critical access, and document emergency restoration through the relevant provider.

Operating the system

Review privileged access monthly and all access quarterly, with immediate review after staffing, vendor, or incident changes. Track credentials, connected apps, domains, numbers, and recovery contacts.

Failure modes to prevent

Shared administrator accounts, agency-owned domains or numbers, secrets in chat, orphaned integrations, excessive exports, and incomplete offboarding create preventable exposure and lock-in.

Related questions

Still stuck on something specific? Ask us on a call and we will answer it properly.

Ask a question
Should this be changed directly in production?

Only low-risk, reversible settings should be changed directly. For workflows, integrations, permissions, routing, and data changes, use test records, a controlled release window, an owner, and a written rollback instruction.

Who should approve the design?

The operational owner should approve business rules, the technical owner should approve implementation and recovery, and compliance or legal reviewers should approve regulated communications and data handling where applicable.

How often should the configuration be reviewed?

Review after material process or product changes and on a recurring schedule. High-volume or revenue-critical systems deserve monthly health checks; stable, lower-risk assets may be reviewed quarterly.

Let us build the system your leads deserve.

Book a 30-minute call. We look at your current setup, tell you what is costing you leads, and outline exactly what we would build, whether or not you hire us.

  • 30 minutes
  • No pitch deck
  • Free audit of your setup